Umar never believed in the abrogation of the stoning verse

Some Sunni sites claim that the verse about stoning does not belong to the Qur’an according to Umar. In this regard, one states the following:

However, the hadith to which the text refers is not found under number 8184, but under number 8071. Moreover, it does not prove anything.
Yunus Ibn Jubair reported that Kathir Ibn Salt said: “Ibn-ul-As and Zaid Ibn Thabit used to write it in the Mus’haf. Then they passed by this verse. So Zaid said: ‘I heard the Messenger of God (s.) say: “If an aged man and woman commit fornication, by all means stone them.’ Then Amr said: “When it was sent down, I came to the Prophet (s.), whereupon I said: “Let it be written down.” Thus, it was as if he hated that.” Then Amr said to him: “Do you not see that if an aged man commits fornication and is married, he is whipped and stoned, and if he is not married, he is whipped, and if a touched woman, when she commits fornication and is married, she is stoned?” [Al-Mustadrak of Al-Hakim, Volume 4, page 400 – 401, Hadith 8071]
حدثني محمد بن صالح بن هانئ ثنا الحسين بن محمد بن زياد ثنا محمد بن المثنى ومحمد بن بشار قالا ثنا محمد بن جعفر ثنا شعبة عن قتادة عن يونس بن جبير عن كثير بن الصلت قال: كان ابن العاص وزيد بن ثابت يكتبان في المصاحف فمرا على هذه الآية فقال زيد سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول: الشيخ والشيخة فارجموهما البتة فقال عمرو: لما نزلت أتيت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فقلت: أكتبها فكأنه كره ذلك فقال له عمرو: ألا ترى أن الشيخ إذا زنى وقد أحصن جلد ورجم وإذا لم يحصن جلد وأن الثيب إذا زنى وقد أحصن رجم
The Prophet does not say a word about abrogation here. All we have here is the personal impression of Amr: “As if he hated that.” And who says at all that the Prophet hated the writing down of the verse? Perhaps he hated it when Amr gave him orders? In any case, the hadith does not provide any clarity. Likewise, the impression of Amr could be a mistake.
Also, the next hadith referred to in the text is not found on page 211, but on page 367 and has no proof in terms of content.
Muhammad reported that Kathir ibn Salt said: “We were at Marwan and among us was Zaid ibn Thabit. Zaid said: “We used to read: “if an aged man and an aged woman commit fornication, by all means stone them.” He said: “So Marwan said: “Do we not put it in the Mus’haf?” He said: “No, do you not see that two touched youths are stoned to death?” He said: “And he said: “They mentioned that and among us was Umar Ibnu l-Khattab. He said: “I am healing you from that one.” We said: “How?” He said: “I come to the Prophet (s.). Then I mention such and such. Then when he mentions stoning, I say, O Messenger of God, let me write down the verse about stoning.” He said: “So I came to him, whereupon I mentioned it.” He said: “Then he mentioned the verse about stoning.” He said: “So he said: “O messenger of God, let me write down the verse about stoning.” He said: “I cannot do that.” [As-Sunan of Al-Baihaqi, Volume 8, Page 367, Hadith 16913]
Umar wants to settle the dispute by asking the prophet to write the verse. The Prophet refuses, saying: “I cannot do that.” What exactly can he not do? Is it that he cannot write? Or maybe he cannot let Umar write? Perhaps he merely hates the writing down of Umar: “As if he hated that.” At any rate, at no point does the prophet say a word about abrogating the verse. Who is surprised then, if Umar wants to add the verse even after his death.
Ibn Ashtah reported in Al-Masahif that Laith Ibn Sa’d said: “The first who collected the Qur’an was Abu Bakr and Zaid wrote it down and people came to Zaid. So he did not write down any verse except with two honest witnesses and the end of the chapter At-Tawbah was not found except with Khuzaimah Ibn Thabit. So he said: “Write it down, for the Messenger of God (s.) equated his testimony with the testimony of two men.” So he wrote it down and Umar came with the verse about stoning. However, he did not write it down as he was the only one.” [Al-Itqan of As-Suyuti, page 131]
وقد أخرج ابن أشته في المصاحف عن الليث بن سعد قال: أول من جمع القرآن أبو بكر وكتبه زيد وكان الناس يأتون زيد بن ثابت فكان لا يكتب آية إلا بشاهدي عدل وأن آخر سورة براءة لم توجد إلا مع خزيمة بن ثابت فقال: اكتبوها فإن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم جعل شهادته بشهادة رجلين فكتب وإن عمر أتى بآية الرجم فلم يكتبها لأنه كان وحده
Then  they  claim:

The hadith to which the text refers is not found under number 151, but under number 156. The word “margin” is mistranslated here.

Yusuf Ibn Mihran reported that Ibn Abbas said: “Umar Ibnu l-Khattab delivered a sermon.” And Hushaim once said: “He gave us a sermon.” Thus, he praised God and extolled Him. Then he mentioned stoning, whereupon he said: “Do not gain a false image from it, for it is a punishment from punishments of God. Behold, the messenger of God stoned and we stoned after him, and would they not say: ‘Umar added to the Scripture of God what is not of it.” Then I would write it in an area from the Mus’haf. Umar Ibnu l-Khattab testified.” And Hushaim once said: “And Abd-ur-Rahman Ibn Awf and So-and-so Ibn So-and-so that the Messenger of God (s.) stoned and we stoned after him and there will be after you people who deny stoning, the Antichrist, intercession, punishment in the grave and people who are released from the fire after they burned.” [Al-Musnad by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Volume 1, Page 296, Hadith 156]
حدثنا هشيم أخبرنا علي بن زيد عن يوسف بن مهران عن ابن عباس قال: خطب عمر بن الخطاب وقال هشيم مرة خطبنا فحمد الله وأثنى عليه فذكر الرجم فقال: لا تخدعن عنه فإنه حد من حدود الله ألا إن رسول الله قد رجم ورجمنا بعده ولولا أن يقول قائلون زاد عمر في كتاب الله عز وجل ما ليس منه لكتبته في ناحية من المصحف شهد عمر بن الخطاب وقال هشيم مرة: وعبد الرحمن بن عوف وفلان وفلان أن رسول الله قد رجم ورجمنا من بعده ألا وإنه سيكون من بعدكم قوم يكذبون بالرجم وبالدجال وبالشفاعة وبعذاب القبر وبقوم يخرجون من النار بعد ما امتحشوا
The word Nahiyah (ناحية) denotes an indefinite area. There is no evidence that it refers to a margin for notes. The same word is used in reference to a place in a house that the Prophet enters.

Humaid reported that Anas said: “The Prophet (s) came in to Umm Sulaim. So she brought him dates and melting butter. He said: “Return your melted butter to its vessel and your dates to their vessel, for I am fasting.” Then he went to an area from the house and performed a voluntary prayer.” [Sahih-ul-Bukhari, page 477, Hadith 1982]
حدثنا محمد بن المثنى قال حدثني خالد وهو ابن الحارث حدثنا حميد عن أنس رضي الله عنه: دخل النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم على أم سليم فأتته بمتر وسمن قال: أعيدوا سمنكم في سقائه وتمركم في وعائه فإني صائم ثم قام إلى ناحية من البيت فصلى غير المكتوبة
Az-Zuhri reported that Umar Ibnu l-Khattab said: “By God, would it not be said: “Umar added something in the Scripture of God” Then I would write it in the Qur’an.” [Nawasikh-ul-Qur’an by Ibn-ul-Jawzi, vol. 1, p. 162]
ابن عيينة عن الزهري عن عمر بن الخطاب قال: وأيم الله لولا يقول قائل زاد عمر في كتاب الله لكتبتها في القرآن
Hereupon it is again claimed:
The hadith to which the text refers is not found under number 7151, but under number 7113. The translation is extremely poor.

Abd-ur-Rahman Ibn Awf reported that Umar Ibnu l-Khattab said: “And they say: “The stoning.” And the Messenger of God (s.) stoned with it and we stoned and God sent it down in His Scripture and would not people say: “He added in the Scripture of God.” Then I would write it with my handwriting until I add it in to the Scripture.” [As-Sunan of An-Nasa’i, Volume 6, Page 408, Hadith 7113]
أخبرنا العباس بن محمد الدوري قال حدثنا أبو نوح عبد الرحمن بن غزوان قال حدثنا شعبة عن سعد بن إبراهيم عن عبيد الله بن عبد الله عن ابن عباس عن عبد الرحمن بن عوف عن عمر بن الخطاب قال: ويقولون الرجم وقد رجم به رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ورجمنا وأنزل الله في كتابه ولولا أن الناس يقولون زاد في كتاب الله لكتبته بخطي حتى ألحقه بالكتاب

This is neither a margin nor a side note. When the Companions wrote verses in the Qur’an, it was perfectly normal for them to use the word ” alhaqa ” (ألحق) for additions. A famous example illustrates this.

Kharijah Ibn Zaid reported that Zaid Ibn Thabit said: “I lost a verse from Al-Ahzab when we were copying the Mus’haf. I had heard it being read by the Messenger of God (s.). Hereupon we searched for it. Then we found it with Khuzaimah Ibn Thabit Al-Ansari: “Among the believers there are people who made true what they vowed to God.” (33:23) So we have added it to his chapter in the Mus’haf.” [Sahih-ul-Bukhari, page 1275, hadith 4988]
قال ابن شهاب وأخبرني خارجة بن زيد بن ثابت سمع زيد بن ثابت قال: فقدت آية من الأحزاب حين نسخنا المصحف قد كنت أسمع رسول الله يقرأ بها فالتمسناها فوجدناها مع خزيمة بن ثابت الأنصاري من المؤمنين رجال صدقوا ما عاهدوا الله عليه فألحقناها في سورتها في المصحف

Abd-ur-Rahman Ibn Awf reported that Umar Ibnu l-Khattab said: “See, people will say: “What about the stoning? In the scripture of God is the flogging.” And the Messenger of God (s.) stoned and we stoned after him and would the proponents not say or the speakers not speak that Umar added in to the Scripture of God what is not from it, then I would write it down as it was sent down.” [Al-Musnad by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Volume 1, Page 327, Hadith 197]
حدثنا هشيم أخبرنا الزهري عن عبيد الله بن عبد الله بن عتبة بن مسعود أخبرني عبد الله بن عباس حدثني عبد الرحمن بن عوف أن عمر بن الخطاب خطب الناس فسمعه يقول: ألا وإن أناسا يقولون: ما بال الرجم في كتاب الله الجلد وقد رجم رسول الله ورجمنا بعده ولولا أن يقول قائلون أو يتكلم متكلمون إن عمر زاد في كتاب الله ما ليس منه لأثبتها كما نزلت
The obstacle for Umar is not abrogation, but people. While Umar believes in the verse, others deny it. This leads to tension. Umar himself never stopped believing in the verse as a part of the Qur’an [Here!]

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply